Last visit was: It is currently 30/11/2015, 23:28

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Load balancing tick
PostPosted: 11/11/2010, 17:11 

Joined: 23/09/2010, 15:36
Posts: 7

using a NP220 running with lucid 10.04.
peter@rattir7:~$ uname -a
Linux rattir7 2.6.32-25-generic #46~ppa1~loms~lucid-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 22 23:33:19 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux

I'm not using HAL and therefore have no laptop-mode.

As shown by powertop, the process [kernel scheduler] Load balancing tick is the main reason for waking up on my little box. On a standard user setting (firefox /w several tabs, nautilus, terminal, wlan) it typically rivals with firefox for the first place, sometimes about the double of amount (of ticks?), sometimes even more.

Example output of powertop:
peter@rattir7:~$ env LANG=en_EN.UTF8 sudo powertop -d
PowerTOP 1.12   (C) 2007, 2008 Intel Corporation

Collecting data for 15 seconds

Your CPU supports the following C-states : C1 C2 C4
Your BIOS reports the following C-states : C1 C2 C4
Cn             Avg residency
C0 (cpu running)        ( 6.8%)
polling        0.0ms ( 0.0%)
C1 mwait     0.2ms ( 0.1%)
C2 mwait     0.8ms ( 1.2%)
C4 mwait     5.6ms (91.9%)
P-states (frequencies)
  1.67 Ghz     3.5%
  1333 Mhz     0.3%
  1000 Mhz    96.2%
Disk accesses:
Wakeups-from-idle per second : 182.2   interval: 15.0s
Power usage (ACPI estimate): 6.1W (5.0 hours)
Top causes for wakeups:
  30.6% ( 70.8)   firefox-bin
  26.9% ( 62.1)   [kernel scheduler] Load balancing tick
  11.9% ( 27.6)   [uhci_hcd:usb5, eth1] <interrupt>
  11.4% ( 26.4)   [extra timer interrupt]
   4.3% ( 10.0)   xbindkeys
   3.6% (  8.4)   [kernel core] hrtimer_start (tick_sched_timer)
   2.6% (  6.1)   [kernel core] add_timer (wl_timer)

As far as I understand, the load balancing tick is a kernel issue cause of traditional linux kernels and can be made tickless to save some energy (->

Also there is/was a bug in newer kernels (2.6.34) concerning this (->

No I ask myself if in your kernel we all use there may be the same or a similar bug, and if it would make sense to make the kernel tickless by default (if it isn't already).

If you think that is of importance, I would gladly help e.g. by compiling and testing such a kernel. But you needed to point me to the config and any obscure resources/patches of the recent ppa kernel.

Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Theme created & kodeki